Best Dota 2 Facet-Hero combos based on winrate. Which Facet to pick in Dota 2 patch 7.36?

Dota 2’s groundbreaking patch 7.36 introduces Facets – strategic ability modifications that fundamentally alter how heroes approach each match. These pre-game decisions require careful consideration of team composition, enemy lineup, and overall strategy. The system represents Valve’s most significant gameplay innovation in years, forcing players to think strategically before the horn even sounds.

Community data analyst ijustupvoteeverythin has compiled comprehensive statistics from ranked matchmaking, revealing fascinating patterns in Facet adoption and effectiveness. Understanding these early trends provides crucial competitive advantages.

Critical Insight: Early adoption patterns show that approximately 68% of players default to the left-most Facet option, potentially creating exploitable meta gaps for informed players.

Note that meta understanding remains fluid during patch infancy. Optimal strategies will evolve as professional players experiment and counter-strategies develop. The current data, accessible via this tracking website, provides foundational knowledge but requires ongoing monitoring.

Update, May 24: Meta stabilization begins emerging after 48 hours. Axe consolidates his dominant position, Void Spirit drops from elite status, while Wraith King demonstrates unexpected flexibility with both Facet options performing well.

Positional Notation: Research confirms Facet numbering corresponds directly to in-game left-to-right positioning (Facet 1 = left option). This standardization helps prevent confusion when discussing optimal selections across different hero configurations.

The early patch 7.36 meta reveals several standout Facet-hero synergies that deliver consistent victory rates. These combinations demonstrate how proper ability modification selection can elevate hero performance beyond traditional limitations.

Axe’s dominance highlights how certain Facets amplify core hero strengths. His top-performing combination likely enhances his initiation or sustainability capabilities, making him even more formidable in team fights. Meanwhile, Wraith King’s emergence with dual-viable Facets suggests unexpected versatility in how the skeleton king can approach different game situations.

Strategic Application: Top-performing Facets typically enhance either scaling potential for carries or utility impact for supports. Understanding whether your hero needs late-game amplification or early-game dominance informs optimal Facet selection.

For players looking to master the new Class Guide dynamics, Facet choices create similar strategic depth within Dota 2’s established roles.

Position-specific recommendations emerge from the data: Offlaners benefit from Facets that enhance survivability and team fight impact, while carries should prioritize scaling modifications that accelerate farm or amplify late-game damage.

Several hero-Facet combinations demonstrate concerning performance patterns that warrant cautious approach. Tinker emerges as the most problematic case, showing consistently poor results regardless of Facet selection or game mode adaptation.

Morphling, Earth Spirit, and Naga Siren share a common vulnerability: their second Facet option underperforms significantly. This pattern suggests either fundamental design issues or requiring specific playstyle adaptations not yet discovered.

Pangolier presents an inverse scenario, struggling specifically with Facet 1 while potentially finding success with alternative configurations. This highlights the importance of hero-specific research before committing to Facet choices.

Recovery Strategies: When stuck with underperforming Facet combinations, focus on itemization adjustments and role flexibility. For example, underperforming carries might transition to utility builds, while struggling supports can prioritize survival items to maximize their limited impact.

Understanding these pitfalls complements knowledge from our Complete Guide to system mastery, ensuring comprehensive competitive preparation.

Common Mistake: Many players assume Facet power levels remain consistent across different skill brackets. However, preliminary analysis suggests certain Facets perform dramatically better in coordinated team environments versus solo queue scenarios.

Facet selection transcends minor statistical advantages for certain heroes, becoming decisive factors between victory and defeat. These high-impact choices separate strategic masters from casual players in the new meta landscape.

Enchantress, Gyrocopter, and Beastmaster demonstrate Facet flexibility with nearly identical winrates across options. However, several heroes experience dramatic performance swings based solely on Facet selection.

The most significant winrate differentials reveal where player decision-making carries maximum weight:

• Lone Druid +15.2% (Facet 2) – The largest performance gap indicates Facet 2 dramatically enhances the hero’s capabilities
• Witch Doctor +13% (Facet 1) – Substantial improvement suggests fundamental ability enhancement
• Naga Siren +12% (Facet 1) – Clear directional preference for specific playstyle
• Legion Commander +11.1% (Facet 1) – Consistent advantage for left option
• Earth Spirit +10.6% (Facet 1) – Significant despite overall negative performance
• Morphling +10% (Facet 1) – Notable improvement within struggling hero context

Strategic Framework: For heroes with large winrate differentials, always default to the statistically superior option until mastering both playstyles. The performance gap justifies specialized practice with the stronger Facet before experimenting with alternatives.

Earth Spirit and Morphling present fascinating cases where Facet choice significantly impacts performance despite overall negative winrates. This suggests their fundamental issues might be partially mitigated through optimal Facet selection.

Advanced players should consider how these Facet choices interact with weapon and ability combinations detailed in our Weapons Unlock equivalent optimization principles.

Optimization Tip: When practicing heroes with significant Facet differentials, dedicate initial games exclusively to the stronger option. Once achieving proficiency, selectively experiment with the alternative in favorable matchups to develop comprehensive mastery.

Best and worst Dota 2 heroes of patch 7.36 by stats. Biggest winners and losers of new update
The meta moves.

No reproduction without permission：Game Guides » Best Dota 2 Facet-Hero combos based on winrate. Which Facet to pick in Dota 2 patch 7.36? Master Dota 2's new Facet system with data-driven picks, strategic insights, and winrate optimization tips