TL;DR
- Day 2 features four best-of-three matches with Tundra favored over OG in the marquee matchup
- Core players Skiter and 33 offer strong fantasy returns but carry matchup-dependent risks
- Mid lane selections require careful consideration of point generation versus win probability
- Support options are limited with iNsania standing out as the premium choice
- PSG.LGD players represent high-risk, high-reward opportunities after poor upper bracket showing
Games and Esports Articles Dota 2
The opening phase of the Main Event has concluded, eliminating four teams from championship contention. The International 2022 Fantasy competition progresses with four crucial matchups on day 2. Let’s identify the optimal player selections for maximum fantasy point accumulation.
Today’s competitive schedule includes:
- Tundra vs OG
- Liquid vs Aster
- EG vs beastcoast
- PSG.LGD vs BOOM
The best-of-one elimination format has concluded, transitioning all remaining matches to best-of-three series that provide more consistent fantasy scoring opportunities.
The Tundra versus OG confrontation presents significant unpredictability, with both squads demonstrating exceptional current form. However, Tundra maintains a slight strategic advantage based on recent performance metrics. In the Liquid versus Aster matchup, Liquid emerges as the preferred selection based on roster consistency. EG should theoretically dominate beastcoast through superior mechanical skill, though this tournament has consistently delivered unexpected outcomes. The PSG.LGD versus BOOM contest presents particular concern, as the Chinese team displayed concerning performance gaps during their Upper Bracket matches, making their players speculative fantasy choices.
“These emotions worth more that any placement or money”. Fishman talks after the game against RNG, comments on the pause at the end
TI11 Fantasy October 21 Player Card Picks:
Cores:
Skiter demonstrates strong statistical performance, though his fantasy point totals may be somewhat elevated due to Tundra’s extensive match victories. Similarly, 33 produces exceptional statistics for his offlane position. If you anticipate their team success, both represent viable selections. Monet and MATUMBAMAN offer consistent production—choose based on your predicted match outcome. Yuragi provides adequate fantasy returns. Should PSG.LGD regain their competitive form, Ame could deliver respectable point generation, though this selection carries substantial risk considering their underwhelming performance against Team Secret.
Advanced fantasy strategy for core players involves evaluating not just raw statistics but also consistency metrics. Players on dominant teams often accumulate points through extended game durations and teamfight participation. Consider that core players from teams expected to win 2-0 series typically generate 15-20% fewer points than those in competitive 2-1 matches.
Mid:
Yopaj- and m1CKe represent strong mid lane options. Bzm becomes viable if you project OG overcoming Tundra. While Abed possesses high victory probability, his fantasy point generation historically falls below elite levels.
Mid laners present unique fantasy considerations. Their point generation heavily depends on hero selection and playstyle—active roaming mids typically outperform farming-oriented counterparts. Additionally, mid players facing aggressive opposing teams often accumulate more points through defensive actions and counter-plays.
For those seeking our Weapons Unlock strategies for other games, similar principles apply: identify players whose roles naturally accumulate the statistics that translate to fantasy points.
Supports:
Beyond iNsania, statistically exceptional support options remain limited for today’s matches. Saksa represents a functional choice, while TIMS or skem offer potential value if BOOM avoids decisive defeat against PSG.LGD. Taiga stands as OG’s most productive support, whereas y typically leads PSG.LGD in fantasy point accumulation.
Support player evaluation requires understanding their team’s strategic approach. Aggressive early-game teams typically provide more stacking, warding, and assist opportunities. For comprehensive team strategy insights, consult our Complete Guide to competitive gameplay fundamentals.
Common fantasy mistakes include overvaluing big-name supports on struggling teams. Remember that support fantasy points heavily correlate with team performance—even skilled players on losing teams struggle to generate significant point totals.
DyrachYO on TI11 sound: “We can hear every smoke, every rune.”
Understanding Class Guide principles from other competitive games can enhance your fantasy decision-making process across different esports titles.
Action Checklist
- Analyze team matchups and predicted series length for optimal point generation
- Prioritize core players from teams expected to play competitive 2-1 series
- Balance mid lane selections between win probability and point generation potential
- Evaluate support players based on team aggression levels and early-game activity
- Monitor last-minute roster changes and strategic announcements before locking selections
No reproduction without permission：Game Guides » The International 2022 Fantasy Guide October 21 Playoff Day 2 Expert fantasy picks and strategic insights for TI11 playoff day 2 with advanced player analysis